Thursday, March 13, 2014

Humanities Responsibility: The Importance of Discourse in Evaluating Science and Technology's Impact




 

                                Since the arguments for and against dropping the bomb have raged for many years I will not attempt to add any new insight on this debate.  Rather, all I will add is that the Atomic bomb displayed a force of destruction previously unimaginable to humans.  The successful manipulation of atomic particles by scientists ushered in an arms race for bigger and stronger weapons which culminated in the creation of weapons so powerful that they could destroy all life on our earth. 

 

                                Conversely, humans have not evolved evolutionarily during this processes, and I fear that a proclivity towards revenge, lust for power, and a desire to dominate all other life forms may in the end have too great of an appeal for an upstart demagogue to repress through rational thinking alone.  We can call this the "human" factor and apply to represent the ubiquitous imperfections of humanity.

 

                                Luckily, this is only my rational brain speaking.  Fortunately, I also think that there is a lot to be hopeful for in the future.  Only we can decide.  In a way this is comforting news because at least humans are in the driving seat, and our fate to no small degree rests in the decisions we make today moving forward.

 

                                While writing this section of my blog I could not help but noticing an often times under-sourced phenomenon we take for granted when thinking about science and technology.  In summary, as is the case with all technological breakthroughs the unintended consequences of such innovations do tend to lead to un-thought of or previously unsought ends.  This idea stems from the autocatalytic school of thought which basically argues that once something gets started things will start happening in ways which we previously thought unimaginable.  Likewise, the speed of changes in the beginning will start off slowly and pick up momentum with the passage of time. 

 

                                In truth, science and technologies' positive and negative impacts on humanity are too great to recount, and my point is not to try and turn back the clock on the world's development.  My opinion is that humans would be wise though to start debating the possible impacts of development before it takes place as opposed to after it has already occurred. 

 

                                In my opinion, attempting to move the world back to a time before such inventions already occurred seems like wishful thinking.  I have a final note of caution regarding developing dangerous and powerful technology.  In the end, when what you have created is so dangerous that you would do anything to keep it away from the eyes of the rest of the world it may be wise to rethink the ramifications of such a creation.

No comments:

Post a Comment